enmesh 发表于 2025-3-23 13:33:40

http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1510/150957/150957_11.png

epicardium 发表于 2025-3-23 17:35:09

http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1510/150957/150957_12.png

Habituate 发表于 2025-3-23 18:12:49

http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1510/150957/150957_13.png

潜伏期 发表于 2025-3-23 23:19:37

http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1510/150957/150957_14.png

吞噬 发表于 2025-3-24 06:05:27

Global Egalitarianism or National Self-Determination?for national self-determination rules out global egalitarianism as an account of global justice is mistaken for a number of reasons, as I have argued in more detail elsewhere (Armstrong, 2010). Actually, global egalitarians are able to carve out space for self-determination in a variety of ways. The

任命 发表于 2025-3-24 09:38:58

http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1510/150957/150957_16.png

monopoly 发表于 2025-3-24 12:47:10

International Political Theoryhttp://image.papertrans.cn/a/image/150957.jpg

GRIEF 发表于 2025-3-24 15:09:50

http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1510/150957/150957_18.png

Halfhearted 发表于 2025-3-24 21:22:07

Crisis, Anxiety and Ontological Insecurity,m, sovereignty, self-determination, and democratic governance. A common element across the various versions of this new paradigm is the dispersal of democratic governance across multiple and overlapping jurisdictions. Governmental processes are no longer seen as discrete, centralized, and homogeneou

conference 发表于 2025-3-25 01:02:33

http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1510/150957/150957_20.png
页: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6
查看完整版本: Titlebook: After the Nation?; Critical Reflections Keith Breen (Lecturer in Political Theory),Shane O Book 2010 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macm