enmesh 发表于 2025-3-23 13:33:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1510/150957/150957_11.pngepicardium 发表于 2025-3-23 17:35:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1510/150957/150957_12.pngHabituate 发表于 2025-3-23 18:12:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1510/150957/150957_13.png潜伏期 发表于 2025-3-23 23:19:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1510/150957/150957_14.png吞噬 发表于 2025-3-24 06:05:27
Global Egalitarianism or National Self-Determination?for national self-determination rules out global egalitarianism as an account of global justice is mistaken for a number of reasons, as I have argued in more detail elsewhere (Armstrong, 2010). Actually, global egalitarians are able to carve out space for self-determination in a variety of ways. The任命 发表于 2025-3-24 09:38:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1510/150957/150957_16.pngmonopoly 发表于 2025-3-24 12:47:10
International Political Theoryhttp://image.papertrans.cn/a/image/150957.jpgGRIEF 发表于 2025-3-24 15:09:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1510/150957/150957_18.pngHalfhearted 发表于 2025-3-24 21:22:07
Crisis, Anxiety and Ontological Insecurity,m, sovereignty, self-determination, and democratic governance. A common element across the various versions of this new paradigm is the dispersal of democratic governance across multiple and overlapping jurisdictions. Governmental processes are no longer seen as discrete, centralized, and homogeneouconference 发表于 2025-3-25 01:02:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1510/150957/150957_20.png