External-Otitis
发表于 2025-3-21 17:11:23
书目名称After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend影响因子(影响力)<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0150938<br><br> <br><br>书目名称After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0150938<br><br> <br><br>书目名称After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend网络公开度<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0150938<br><br> <br><br>书目名称After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend网络公开度学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0150938<br><br> <br><br>书目名称After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend被引频次<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0150938<br><br> <br><br>书目名称After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend被引频次学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0150938<br><br> <br><br>书目名称After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend年度引用<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0150938<br><br> <br><br>书目名称After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend年度引用学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0150938<br><br> <br><br>书目名称After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend读者反馈<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0150938<br><br> <br><br>书目名称After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend读者反馈学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0150938<br><br> <br><br>
来自于
发表于 2025-3-21 23:15:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1510/150938/150938_2.png
过分自信
发表于 2025-3-22 00:26:15
,Kuhn, Bayes and ‘Theory-Choice’: How Revolutionary is Kuhn’s Account of Theoretical Change?, Smith, who opined ‘I never read a book before reviewing it — it prejudices a man so!’ Another favourite — in similar (though strictly speaking contrary) vein — is from a psychologist friend of Wesley Salmon’s, who, when asked for his opinion of the latest Dianetics tosh by Lafayette Ron Hubbard, ap
Nonconformist
发表于 2025-3-22 06:01:35
With Friends Like These ..., or What is Inductivism and Why is it Off the Agenda?,sive. On one side, indisputably, was Karl Popper. The name he coined for his foes had even by the 1980s no entry in the ., the ., the ., or even that repository of words too unrespectable to make such august lexica, Partridge’s .. He called them “.“.
BAN
发表于 2025-3-22 10:42:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1510/150938/150938_5.png
水土
发表于 2025-3-22 16:10:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1510/150938/150938_6.png
巧办法
发表于 2025-3-22 19:07:41
Methodological Pluralism, Normative Naturalism and the Realist Aim of Science,ve ground for scientific theory appraisal and acceptance. The second task is to explain how application of this methodology leads to advance toward the aim(s) of science. In other words, the goal of the theory of method is to provide an integrated explanation of both rational scientific theory choic
Notify
发表于 2025-3-22 22:00:34
Hard Problems in the Philosophy of Science: Idealisation and Commensurability,ted by Hume’s problem of induction has always kept the issue of scientific truth at the forefront of philosophical research. Philosophers expended great energy in defending a broad spectrum of replies to Hume’s scepticism, ranging from the view that theories are merely instruments for the control an
AUGUR
发表于 2025-3-23 03:39:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1510/150938/150938_9.png
arsenal
发表于 2025-3-23 06:54:31
Criminal Profiling of Serial Arson Offenses,at energy in defending a broad spectrum of replies to Hume’s scepticism, ranging from the view that theories are merely instruments for the control and prediction of nature, to realist views of science (which hold that science aims at the truth about the world, and is rational in the pursuit of this goal).