审问,审讯
发表于 2025-3-26 22:00:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1425/142478/142478_31.png
归功于
发表于 2025-3-27 02:27:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1425/142478/142478_32.png
放大
发表于 2025-3-27 08:03:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1425/142478/142478_33.png
moribund
发表于 2025-3-27 10:54:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1425/142478/142478_34.png
罐里有戒指
发表于 2025-3-27 15:09:46
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7985-1637-3argue why it is fundamental to ground this social-science construct on psychological/cognitive notions, like human ‘gnoseological deficit’; of our “rationality biases” but of just of our understanding and knowledge. We discuss why it’s so disturbing/problematic—the assiom that somebody might know be
Magisterial
发表于 2025-3-27 20:43:02
Jung im Alter? Die psychologische Dimension,l adoption’: X makes Y’s purpose his own; Y’s need/desire becomes X’s purpose. How? Why? ‘Dependence’ of Y from X relative to his goal Gy: Y has not the ‘power’ of achieving his goal, while X would have the power to realize Y’s goal. Y ‘depends’ on X: he can realize his goal only if X acts. ‘Autonom
剥削
发表于 2025-3-27 22:27:12
B. Brosig,S. N. Euler,E. Brähler,U. Gielertended ‘functions’/goals of Tutelage; two kinds of finalism..Y’s attitudes about his dependence on X’s tutelage, power and influence. His limited understanding: who pursue a goal assigned to him doesn’t necessarily understand the ends of that goal. Why subjection is not necessarily imposed but can b
GEN
发表于 2025-3-28 04:42:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1425/142478/142478_38.png
分期付款
发表于 2025-3-28 08:46:14
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7985-1637-3orm of tutelage, from the interpersonal to the economic and political layer (e.g., opposition to welfare state). True “paternalism” is a manipulatory and selfish pseudo-tutelary attitude. Do Y’s (a posteriori) consent? And his satisfaction makes less manipulatory/paternalistic X’s intervention/decis
无政府主义者
发表于 2025-3-28 11:48:21
Jung im Alter? Die psychologische Dimension,ng our behavior. Normative representations and motivation; why we should obey/adhere to. Norms prescribe minds. Values and non-instrumental adhesion. Any recognized “right” implies a “duty” for somebody else. Any “duty” protects somebody (tutelarity). Education as internalized disciplines: becoming