ANIM 发表于 2025-3-26 23:23:29
Michael Oberguggenberger,Alexander Ostermannhough not exclusively, true for climate change mitigation where many socially relevant aspects are still poorly understood. Section . introduces the highly influential Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and its integrated economic assessments, particularly those of IPCC Working Group IPseudoephedrine 发表于 2025-3-27 04:51:28
https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27564-9nce, policy-relevance and political legitimacy. Section . provides some examples in terms of existing criticism of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), and, finally, Sect. . identifies the trade-offs between the general norms for scientific expertise in public policy as being the keFACT 发表于 2025-3-27 08:14:24
https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27564-9c and the legitimisation models of the role of scientific expertise in policy; these four models are prevalent in practice. Section . explains core common characteristics of these prevalent models. The systematic analysis of the four models – particularly their philosophical assumptions on scientififacilitate 发表于 2025-3-27 10:03:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1419/141866/141866_34.pngNoisome 发表于 2025-3-27 14:21:07
Michael Oberguggenberger,Alexander Ostermannpragmatic science-policy model based on this Deweyan-Putnamian pragmatism. In a highly interdisciplinary manner, and jointly with stakeholders and the public, this refined pragmatic model suggests (i) careful exploration of alternative problem framings and (ii) critical reflection on different polic有毒 发表于 2025-3-27 18:24:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1419/141866/141866_36.pngCLASP 发表于 2025-3-27 23:43:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1419/141866/141866_37.pngconfide 发表于 2025-3-28 04:31:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1419/141866/141866_38.pngDysplasia 发表于 2025-3-28 09:14:30
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-21607-1ms of (i) considerable research gaps regarding retrospective, social-science policy analysis, and (ii) political disputes over value-laden findings with far-reaching implications for domestic policies. All things considered, however, both the AR4 and the AR5 did a good job. In contrast to some exist运动性 发表于 2025-3-28 11:32:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1419/141866/141866_40.png