burgeon
发表于 2025-3-21 18:56:59
书目名称(Un)explainable Technology影响因子(影响力)<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0100115<br><br> <br><br>书目名称(Un)explainable Technology影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0100115<br><br> <br><br>书目名称(Un)explainable Technology网络公开度<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0100115<br><br> <br><br>书目名称(Un)explainable Technology网络公开度学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0100115<br><br> <br><br>书目名称(Un)explainable Technology被引频次<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0100115<br><br> <br><br>书目名称(Un)explainable Technology被引频次学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0100115<br><br> <br><br>书目名称(Un)explainable Technology年度引用<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0100115<br><br> <br><br>书目名称(Un)explainable Technology年度引用学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0100115<br><br> <br><br>书目名称(Un)explainable Technology读者反馈<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0100115<br><br> <br><br>书目名称(Un)explainable Technology读者反馈学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0100115<br><br> <br><br>
archetype
发表于 2025-3-22 00:06:17
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-5373-4xplainability, interpretability, contestability, certifiability, auditability, post-hoc rationalizability, and transparency. In outlining the different epistemic and practical purposes pursued with these techniques, we can determine and disambiguate some of the confusion present in the debate, and c
panorama
发表于 2025-3-22 04:23:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/11/1002/100115/100115_3.png
粉笔
发表于 2025-3-22 08:06:50
Zusammenfassung der Ergebnisse,e turn towards the deontologically motivated debate of “right to explanation” and their arguments. In refuting that approach on theoretical and practical grounds, we instead introduce the idea of a “claim to expertise”, which preserves our practices and allows unexplainable technology to be added to
松驰
发表于 2025-3-22 10:52:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/11/1002/100115/100115_5.png
极力证明
发表于 2025-3-22 16:02:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/11/1002/100115/100115_6.png
ethnology
发表于 2025-3-22 19:55:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/11/1002/100115/100115_7.png
Chauvinistic
发表于 2025-3-22 23:57:49
978-3-031-68100-4The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024
胆小懦夫
发表于 2025-3-23 02:47:31
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-5522-6By summarizing the points made in this book, this chapter concludes the line of argument. Explainability appears less relevant in most contexts, and in those in which it does, having expert advocates work on your behalf is the precedented, more established, and less disruptive solution.
Nausea
发表于 2025-3-23 08:35:58
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-5373-4xplainability, interpretability, contestability, certifiability, auditability, post-hoc rationalizability, and transparency. In outlining the different epistemic and practical purposes pursued with these techniques, we can determine and disambiguate some of the confusion present in the debate, and clarify what it actually is we are interested in.