擦掉
发表于 2025-3-23 10:28:32
http://image.papertrans.cn/v/image/983455.jpg
防锈
发表于 2025-3-23 17:46:45
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65253-5scientific policy advice; scientific integrity; research ethics; Ethics; policy advisors; decision making
resuscitation
发表于 2025-3-23 21:06:02
Deciding on Tools and Risks,he scientist to respect the subjects he researches (e.g., animals, environment, or human beings). Second, choices must be made between measuring instruments that are epistemologically equivalent but might have different social consequences. Third, choices must be made about the level of risk of being wrong that is acceptable.
Nibble
发表于 2025-3-23 23:40:54
Deciding on the Advisory Role,rs. Such decisions involve selection of material. They also involve choosing between possible frames and communicative and rhetorical instruments. The selective role of the scientific advisor is larger when he is confronted with policy problems that are unstructured.
完全
发表于 2025-3-24 05:16:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9835/983455/983455_15.png
Tinea-Capitis
发表于 2025-3-24 08:21:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9835/983455/983455_16.png
angiography
发表于 2025-3-24 13:01:43
Solving the Issue by Introducing Principles and Procedures,ian and deontological traditions to provide guiding principles for scientific advisors. This approach has its values but also must confront two sorts of problems. One sort of problem concerns the application of the principles; the other the choice between different principles.
FLING
发表于 2025-3-24 16:48:03
Solving the Issue by Bringing Virtue Ethics into Play,al scientific virtues and another that focusses on practical wisdom (phronesis) that is at home in politics. A third approach that builds on MacIntyre’s notion of practices is introduced to integrate the two, leading to the idea of the academic citizen.
600
发表于 2025-3-24 22:25:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9835/983455/983455_19.png
Outshine
发表于 2025-3-25 00:23:32
978-3-319-87984-0The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018