敬礼 发表于 2025-3-28 17:07:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9829/982865/982865_41.png平躺 发表于 2025-3-28 18:57:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9829/982865/982865_42.pngIntuitive 发表于 2025-3-28 23:22:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9829/982865/982865_43.pngPreamble 发表于 2025-3-29 03:52:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9829/982865/982865_44.png高调 发表于 2025-3-29 10:27:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9829/982865/982865_45.pnglinear 发表于 2025-3-29 15:12:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9829/982865/982865_46.pngApraxia 发表于 2025-3-29 15:52:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9829/982865/982865_47.png性学院 发表于 2025-3-29 22:25:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9829/982865/982865_48.pngheterogeneous 发表于 2025-3-30 00:21:42
Silas K. Hocking, ,, and the Poetics of the Prolific,as clarity that embeds occasional ornamentation as a kind of hospitality is reflected in .’s use of figuration at moments when characters engage with Methodism, and in the novel’s thematisation of the demands of hospitality.CHURL 发表于 2025-3-30 07:43:26
,Double Standards: Reading the Revolutionary Doppelgänger in ,,of double revolutionaries, theatrical performer and activist intellectual, the novel acknowledges the dangerous reliance of radical politics on rhetoric and spectacle but refrains from dismissing the ideas that lie behind the public act of revolutionary commitment.