Fierce
发表于 2025-3-30 10:59:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9827/982609/982609_51.png
前奏曲
发表于 2025-3-30 15:04:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9827/982609/982609_52.png
corpus-callosum
发表于 2025-3-30 18:24:48
X-Ray Emission from Mass Accreting Neutron StarsHercules X-1 - which is the best-known among all accreting neutron stars. In particular we shall discuss recent progress which has been made in understanding (1) the geometrical situation of the neutron star and its immediate surroundings and (2) the 35-day-cycle of the source.
SHRIK
发表于 2025-3-30 23:24:13
Cosmic-Ray Acceleration in UHE and VHE Gamma-Ray Sources including Her X-1, LMC X-4, Cen X-3 and 4U 0115 + 63. These observations, if subsequently found to be statistically significant, imply the acceleration of high energy cosmic rays in these sources. In this paper, we discuss briefly some of the models so far proposed for cosmic ray acceleration in th
mucous-membrane
发表于 2025-3-31 00:59:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9827/982609/982609_55.png
cuticle
发表于 2025-3-31 07:53:14
Source Mechanisms (Accretion Objects)e 10. eV). Dynamo action by an accretion disc (Brecher) seems confined to large distances from the neutron star in many cases, where little of the gravitational energy is tapped. Accreting matter probably has too low a density to sustain shock acceleration in a 10. gauss field. Some neutron stars sp
Neonatal
发表于 2025-3-31 11:53:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9827/982609/982609_57.png
CHASM
发表于 2025-3-31 13:40:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9827/982609/982609_58.png
painkillers
发表于 2025-3-31 21:12:58
VHE Gamma Rays from Cygnus X-3erved during the radio flare of early Oct. at a phase of .. = 0.74. No evidence for pulsar periodicity was found during the burst. Searches for periodicity outside the burst have not yet produced positive results.
syring
发表于 2025-4-1 00:14:56
Search for a 12.59 ms. Pulsar in Cygnus X-3 at E > 400 GeVa 12.5908 ms. pulsar, as recently reported by Chadwick et al. (1). The results of our period search fail to substantiate the original observation. Reasons why the two results may not be incompatible are discussed.