infantile 发表于 2025-3-30 10:31:50
Scientific Realism and the Mind-Independence of the Worlds captured by what I call ‘the possibility of divergence’, viz., the possibility of a gap between what there is in the world and what is issued (or licensed) as existing by a suitable (even ideal) set of epistemic practices and conditions. I break up the realist commitment to mind-independence into闷热 发表于 2025-3-30 15:58:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9807/980686/980686_52.pngConjuction 发表于 2025-3-30 18:55:35
Retention, Truth-Content and Selective Realismin successful theories. Second generation approaches address those issues by basing selection on detailed inferential analyses of impressive predictions drawn from the theory at hand. The leading reformed strategies advocate commitment to just theory-parts that are “absolutely indispensable” for advFEAT 发表于 2025-3-30 23:05:00
A Scheme-Interpretationist and Actionistic Scientific Realismthin such a perspective. Thus, we have only the possibility of attending to or grasping states relative to interpretive perspectives. That means any actions and recognitions whatsoever are dependent on methodological schematizations and perspectives previously taken over or methodologically implied.headlong 发表于 2025-3-31 01:43:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9807/980686/980686_55.pngSynthesize 发表于 2025-3-31 06:36:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9807/980686/980686_56.pngdysphagia 发表于 2025-3-31 11:39:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9807/980686/980686_57.png