热情赞扬 发表于 2025-3-26 21:29:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9803/980243/980243_31.png提炼 发表于 2025-3-27 01:30:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9803/980243/980243_32.png骇人 发表于 2025-3-27 05:29:06
Clarity as Objectivized BeliefIntuitively, if something is clear, then it is not vague. As the dictionary (.) succinctly puts it: “vague ≠ clear.” But this is of course quite compatible with the fact that . itself isavague predicate. As Barker and Taranto (2003: 17) point out:CLOWN 发表于 2025-3-27 10:06:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9803/980243/980243_34.png话 发表于 2025-3-27 17:27:28
978-1-349-31574-1Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2011种类 发表于 2025-3-27 20:03:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9803/980243/980243_36.pngAtmosphere 发表于 2025-3-27 22:47:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9803/980243/980243_37.png展览 发表于 2025-3-28 02:26:09
2946-2576about vagueness. Three main issues are addressed: gradable expressions and comparison, the semantics of degree adverbs and intensifiers (such as ‘clearly‘), and ways of evading the sorites paradox.978-1-349-31574-1978-0-230-29931-3Series ISSN 2946-2576 Series E-ISSN 2946-2584considerable 发表于 2025-3-28 06:44:46
Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language and Cognitionhttp://image.papertrans.cn/v/image/980243.jpg机密 发表于 2025-3-28 12:26:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/99/9803/980243/980243_40.png