cauda-equina 发表于 2025-3-26 21:56:59

Ambivalent Anti-patriarchalism,es of the public sphere and confining them to the private. As the tradition developed, she suggests, liberals became more coy about sexual difference; women were forgotten and eventually it came to be assumed that they were, or should be, included in universal principles of liberty and equality:

朦胧 发表于 2025-3-27 01:50:43

Book 1998‘ is used as an ‘undecidable‘ in the Derridean sense to produce the opposition between feminine private and masculine public spheres; these texts are then linked to liberal-democratic social and political practices, including feminism as a social movement.

条街道往前推 发表于 2025-3-27 07:23:58

http://reply.papertrans.cn/95/9423/942215/942215_33.png

抛物线 发表于 2025-3-27 10:32:36

http://reply.papertrans.cn/95/9423/942215/942215_34.png

要塞 发表于 2025-3-27 14:45:21

ok at variations in liberalism, and in particular at its democratisation in the nineteenth century, and at how feminists have used liberalism as a resource. Liberalism is analysed using a post-structuralist theory of hegemony: texts of liberal political philosophy are deconstructed to show how the t

legislate 发表于 2025-3-27 21:17:47

10楼
页: 1 2 3 [4]
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Universal Difference; Feminism and the Lib Kate Nash Book 1998 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1998 democrac