鸣叫
发表于 2025-3-28 17:14:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/95/9421/942042/942042_41.png
pellagra
发表于 2025-3-28 21:19:54
A Radiation Detector,recisely the issue raised in the last chapter, viz., how would one link the theoretical energy flux with something that could be measured in the real world? The aim here is once again to give a brief summary and concentrate on the question of what one should or should not expect on the basis of GR a
inscribe
发表于 2025-3-29 02:27:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/95/9421/942042/942042_43.png
外形
发表于 2025-3-29 06:41:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/95/9421/942042/942042_44.png
Infraction
发表于 2025-3-29 10:17:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/95/9421/942042/942042_45.png
perjury
发表于 2025-3-29 14:10:09
Conclusion,spacetime, so one did not have to worry about the fact that the generally accepted strong equivalence principle implies that a charge that is stationary relative to standard coordinates for such a spacetime, in which the metric components happen to be independent of the time coordinate, is predicted
ABYSS
发表于 2025-3-29 17:41:22
Book 2008dline through a flat spacetime, i.e., whether the Lorentz-Dirac equation is right. There are related questions in curved spacetimes, e.g., do different varieties of equivalence principle apply to charged particles, and can a static charge in a static spacetime radiate electromagnetic energy? The pro
corpus-callosum
发表于 2025-3-29 21:16:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/95/9421/942042/942042_48.png
Misnomer
发表于 2025-3-30 02:17:59
,Derivation of the Lorentz–Dirac Equation,tion derived from energy–momentum conservation turns out to be zero?.One is inclined to look at the derivation of the Lorentz-Dirac equation, because the radiation reaction terms turn up there.We begin with Parrott’s derivation in and compare it with Dirac’s original 1938 derivation in .
Bronchial-Tubes
发表于 2025-3-30 05:32:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/95/9421/942042/942042_50.png