过滤 发表于 2025-3-27 00:18:27

http://reply.papertrans.cn/95/9418/941713/941713_31.png

饶舌的人 发表于 2025-3-27 01:54:33

http://reply.papertrans.cn/95/9418/941713/941713_32.png

钢盔 发表于 2025-3-27 05:54:26

http://reply.papertrans.cn/95/9418/941713/941713_33.png

Serenity 发表于 2025-3-27 12:37:20

http://reply.papertrans.cn/95/9418/941713/941713_34.png

carotenoids 发表于 2025-3-27 15:01:01

Conclusion: No Gap to Mind, we find the idea that whatever we think or do must have first been processed in some way. This, in itself, would be trivially acceptable if the process were not posited as explanatory. If, that is, it were a mere mechanical description of what happens in our bodies when we speak or move, a descript

书法 发表于 2025-3-27 18:33:20

http://reply.papertrans.cn/95/9418/941713/941713_36.png

进取心 发表于 2025-3-28 01:20:47

http://reply.papertrans.cn/95/9418/941713/941713_37.png

Digest 发表于 2025-3-28 02:06:46

http://reply.papertrans.cn/95/9418/941713/941713_38.png

厚颜 发表于 2025-3-28 07:13:15

http://reply.papertrans.cn/95/9418/941713/941713_39.png

Jacket 发表于 2025-3-28 10:53:21

http://reply.papertrans.cn/95/9418/941713/941713_40.png
页: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Understanding Wittgenstein‘s On Certainty; Danièle Moyal-Sharrock Book 2004 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited