Mosquito 发表于 2025-3-21 17:02:27

书目名称Understanding Wittgenstein影响因子(影响力)<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0941712<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Understanding Wittgenstein影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0941712<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Understanding Wittgenstein网络公开度<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0941712<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Understanding Wittgenstein网络公开度学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0941712<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Understanding Wittgenstein被引频次<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0941712<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Understanding Wittgenstein被引频次学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0941712<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Understanding Wittgenstein年度引用<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0941712<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Understanding Wittgenstein年度引用学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0941712<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Understanding Wittgenstein读者反馈<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0941712<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Understanding Wittgenstein读者反馈学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0941712<br><br>        <br><br>

服从 发表于 2025-3-21 20:27:15

,Can Whether One Proposition Makes Sense Depend on the Truth of Another? (, 2.0211–2), seem to me to mark definitive and unassailable landmarks in our understanding of some of the deepest questions of philosophy. And yet alongside these insights there is a theory of the nature of the relation between language and reality which appears both to be impossible to work out in detail in a

一骂死割除 发表于 2025-3-22 01:38:29

http://reply.papertrans.cn/95/9418/941712/941712_3.png

石墨 发表于 2025-3-22 07:25:27

http://reply.papertrans.cn/95/9418/941712/941712_4.png

逗留 发表于 2025-3-22 11:54:00

Wittgenstein and Idealism, in the fact that the limits of . (of that language which alone I understand) mean the limits of my world.’ The later part of this repeats what was said in summary at 5.6: ‘the limits of my language mean the limits of my world’. And the key to the problem ‘how much truth there is in solipsism’ has b

游行 发表于 2025-3-22 13:49:17

http://reply.papertrans.cn/95/9418/941712/941712_6.png

nominal 发表于 2025-3-22 17:11:03

http://reply.papertrans.cn/95/9418/941712/941712_7.png

emission 发表于 2025-3-22 21:53:51

http://reply.papertrans.cn/95/9418/941712/941712_8.png

人工制品 发表于 2025-3-23 05:05:06

Other Minds,r that may be given to a question about the meaning of ‘It is 5 o’clock on the sun’. Wittgenstein does not compare other answers that may be given to the two questions. And he does not compare the questions themselves in respect of what lies behind them — making them ones which we can, or cannot, ea

Ceramic 发表于 2025-3-23 06:24:47

Wittgenstein on the Soul,t religions. Although it sets man apart and places him in a unique category, it should not be taken to imply that there is no difference between what is alive and has sentience, apart from man, and what is lifeless and unconscious. This was Descartes’ error. For he ran together several distinctions
页: [1] 2 3 4 5 6
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Understanding Wittgenstein; Royal Institute of Philosophy Book 1974 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1974 Lu