famine
发表于 2025-3-25 05:49:21
Recognizing Argument Structures,rotection. Furthermore, it was established that the conceptual representation for this type of editorials forms an argument graph in which configurations of support and attack relationships among beliefs are organized by instances of argument units (AUs). This chapter examines another interrelated i
BOLUS
发表于 2025-3-25 10:11:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/95/9415/941418/941418_22.png
EXCEL
发表于 2025-3-25 12:23:51
Annotated Example of the OpEd System, of this approach, argument comprehension in OpEd is not considered as an isolated task but rather as an integral aspect of language comprehension. As such, OpEd’s process model involves the use of techniques for mapping input editorial text into an argument graph that represents and maintains the c
V洗浴
发表于 2025-3-25 18:02:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/95/9415/941418/941418_24.png
Servile
发表于 2025-3-25 23:29:42
Memory Search and Retrieval,hension, and answer generation is performed by a recursive-descent, English generator. This chapter examines the techniques used in the process of retrieving information from conceptual representations of editorials.
isotope
发表于 2025-3-26 00:53:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/95/9415/941418/941418_26.png
Customary
发表于 2025-3-26 07:30:48
Recognizing Argument Structures,ons of support and attack relationships among beliefs are organized by instances of argument units (AUs). This chapter examines another interrelated issue addressed within the context of OpEd, namely: how the components of an editorial’s argument graph are recognized from the editorial text.
CAMP
发表于 2025-3-26 09:22:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/95/9415/941418/941418_28.png
Adrenal-Glands
发表于 2025-3-26 14:17:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/95/9415/941418/941418_29.png
笨拙处理
发表于 2025-3-26 20:45:01
Argument Units, are not instances of single attack or support relationships, but rather configurations of such relationships. Those configurations allow editorial writers to: (1) show awareness of their opponents’ beliefs; (2) contradict their opponent’s beliefs; and (3) provide justifications for their own beliefs.