DART
发表于 2025-3-21 19:52:28
书目名称Understanding Anselm‘s Ontological Argument影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/if/?ISSN=BK0941303<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Understanding Anselm‘s Ontological Argument影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/ifr/?ISSN=BK0941303<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Understanding Anselm‘s Ontological Argument网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/at/?ISSN=BK0941303<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Understanding Anselm‘s Ontological Argument网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/atr/?ISSN=BK0941303<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Understanding Anselm‘s Ontological Argument被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/tc/?ISSN=BK0941303<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Understanding Anselm‘s Ontological Argument被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/tcr/?ISSN=BK0941303<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Understanding Anselm‘s Ontological Argument年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/ii/?ISSN=BK0941303<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Understanding Anselm‘s Ontological Argument年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/iir/?ISSN=BK0941303<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Understanding Anselm‘s Ontological Argument读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/5y/?ISSN=BK0941303<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Understanding Anselm‘s Ontological Argument读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/5yr/?ISSN=BK0941303<br><br> <br><br>
长处
发表于 2025-3-21 20:48:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/95/9414/941303/941303_2.png
过份艳丽
发表于 2025-3-22 02:50:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/95/9414/941303/941303_3.png
Visual-Acuity
发表于 2025-3-22 04:42:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/95/9414/941303/941303_4.png
macrophage
发表于 2025-3-22 09:11:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/95/9414/941303/941303_5.png
Matrimony
发表于 2025-3-22 15:55:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/95/9414/941303/941303_6.png
OATH
发表于 2025-3-22 18:02:56
Rebuttal of Rebuttals,nt. More serious is the argument, made both by Gaunilo himself and by Thomas Aquinas, that God does not exist in the intellect, although this objection can ultimately be met. The other famous argument against Anselm, Kant’s claim that existence is not a real predicate, is frequently misunderstood. It too fails as a refutation of Anselm’s argument.
Criteria
发表于 2025-3-22 23:57:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/95/9414/941303/941303_8.png
Arthritis
发表于 2025-3-23 02:46:19
tudies have done.Concludes that Anselm is successful at prov.Anselm‘s ontological argument is one of the most fascinating, most controversial, and most misunderstood arguments in the entire history of Western thought. By centring the argument firmly in the Neoplatonic tradition within which Anselm w
恃强凌弱的人
发表于 2025-3-23 08:11:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/95/9414/941303/941303_10.png