DART 发表于 2025-3-21 19:52:28

书目名称Understanding Anselm‘s Ontological Argument影响因子(影响力)<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0941303<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Understanding Anselm‘s Ontological Argument影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0941303<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Understanding Anselm‘s Ontological Argument网络公开度<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0941303<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Understanding Anselm‘s Ontological Argument网络公开度学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0941303<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Understanding Anselm‘s Ontological Argument被引频次<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0941303<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Understanding Anselm‘s Ontological Argument被引频次学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0941303<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Understanding Anselm‘s Ontological Argument年度引用<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0941303<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Understanding Anselm‘s Ontological Argument年度引用学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0941303<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Understanding Anselm‘s Ontological Argument读者反馈<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0941303<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Understanding Anselm‘s Ontological Argument读者反馈学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0941303<br><br>        <br><br>

长处 发表于 2025-3-21 20:48:24

http://reply.papertrans.cn/95/9414/941303/941303_2.png

过份艳丽 发表于 2025-3-22 02:50:27

http://reply.papertrans.cn/95/9414/941303/941303_3.png

Visual-Acuity 发表于 2025-3-22 04:42:42

http://reply.papertrans.cn/95/9414/941303/941303_4.png

macrophage 发表于 2025-3-22 09:11:03

http://reply.papertrans.cn/95/9414/941303/941303_5.png

Matrimony 发表于 2025-3-22 15:55:46

http://reply.papertrans.cn/95/9414/941303/941303_6.png

OATH 发表于 2025-3-22 18:02:56

Rebuttal of Rebuttals,nt. More serious is the argument, made both by Gaunilo himself and by Thomas Aquinas, that God does not exist in the intellect, although this objection can ultimately be met. The other famous argument against Anselm, Kant’s claim that existence is not a real predicate, is frequently misunderstood. It too fails as a refutation of Anselm’s argument.

Criteria 发表于 2025-3-22 23:57:08

http://reply.papertrans.cn/95/9414/941303/941303_8.png

Arthritis 发表于 2025-3-23 02:46:19

tudies have done.Concludes that Anselm is successful at prov.Anselm‘s ontological argument is one of the most fascinating, most controversial, and most misunderstood arguments in the entire history of Western thought. By centring the argument firmly in the Neoplatonic tradition within which Anselm w

恃强凌弱的人 发表于 2025-3-23 08:11:58

http://reply.papertrans.cn/95/9414/941303/941303_10.png
页: [1] 2 3 4
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Understanding Anselm‘s Ontological Argument; Guy Jackson Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licens