垄断
发表于 2025-3-26 22:12:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8853/885286/885286_31.png
强制令
发表于 2025-3-27 05:05:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8853/885286/885286_32.png
全等
发表于 2025-3-27 07:50:00
,Earning the Vote with Honour. Suffrage, Economic Independence, and Gender in Norway, ca. 1814–1919,for men who paid land taxes and high-level civil servants. The reasoning was that these men could act independently and for the common good, thus receiving trust and esteem from other eligible citizens. Consequently, to paraphrase the British sociologist T. H. Marshall, political rights in Norway we
transdermal
发表于 2025-3-27 12:03:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8853/885286/885286_34.png
EXPEL
发表于 2025-3-27 15:33:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8853/885286/885286_35.png
LAY
发表于 2025-3-27 20:47:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8853/885286/885286_36.png
OMIT
发表于 2025-3-28 00:17:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8853/885286/885286_37.png
Onerous
发表于 2025-3-28 03:35:14
Exclusion in Fine Print: Antidemocratic Ideals and Strategies for Electoral Exclusion in Brazil, 18 severely limited voter participation. This chapter explores these antidemocratic strategies, focusing on reforms in 1881, 1904, and 1916. Ostensibly aimed at reducing electoral fraud, these reforms instead created bureaucratic barriers that excluded the poor, illiterate, and Afro-descendant populat
photophobia
发表于 2025-3-28 06:27:23
,The Politics, Practices, and Emotions of Suffrage Exclusion in Iceland, 1915–1934,ng contemporary political discourses and drawing on the testimonies of excluded individuals, voting registers, and poor relief records, I demonstrate how the citizenship of the poor was contested not only at the national level but also at the local and individual levels, even at the polling station.
教义
发表于 2025-3-28 10:46:41
The Limits of Citizenship: Economic Barriers to Suffrage in Nineteenth and Twentieth-Century Canadah a focus on property and taxpayer voting qualifications, and secondly, exclusions of those receiving state or charitable assistance, including the aged, sick, and poor. These prohibitions denoting class and wealth were intertwined with changing gender-based, racial, and colonial voting restrictions