消息灵通
发表于 2025-3-28 14:52:17
Stefano Belfioreychotherapy of Chicago, where I trained, offered a program specializing in the work of Heinz Kohut and the theory he developed, known as . I was struck by and drawn to what many thought of as Kohut’s radical and necessary shift from Freud’s classical drive model postulating that humanity is primaril
玩忽职守
发表于 2025-3-28 19:43:46
Alan Pickavert and understand the complexities of black women’s experiences of embodiment. Some years ago, I reported the following case vignette to them: An African American mother is in family court where it will be determined whether she regains full and unsupervised custody of her four-year-old daughter. The
繁忙
发表于 2025-3-29 00:52:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8831/883077/883077_43.png
泥瓦匠
发表于 2025-3-29 05:23:47
Arsen Pavasovićgeneral theory which will improve both through mutual correction, and starting right now we should be preparing for that prospect by showing the relations which could exist between them” (cited in Noam, Kohlberg, & Snarey, 1983, p. 59). As if to redeem Piaget’s prophecy, a number of papers have appe
surrogate
发表于 2025-3-29 10:00:20
general theory which will improve both through mutual correction, and starting right now we should be preparing for that prospect by showing the relations which could exist between them” (cited in Noam, Kohlberg, & Snarey, 1983, p. 59). As if to redeem Piaget’s prophecy, a number of papers have appe
floaters
发表于 2025-3-29 12:32:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8831/883077/883077_46.png
BRIBE
发表于 2025-3-29 18:43:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8831/883077/883077_47.png
以烟熏消毒
发表于 2025-3-29 21:40:56
Alain Miossecgeneral theory which will improve both through mutual correction, and starting right now we should be preparing for that prospect by showing the relations which could exist between them” (cited in Noam, Kohlberg, & Snarey, 1983, p. 59). As if to redeem Piaget’s prophecy, a number of papers have appe
厌恶
发表于 2025-3-30 00:16:19
Juan L. Suárez De Viveroies between our work and others’. In this chapter we compare and contrast our theory with seven others: the social psychology of Mead (1934), three theories exemplifying the structure school within symbolic interactionism—McCall and Simmons (1966; 1978), Stryker(1968; 1980), and Burke (e.g., 1980; 1
树木心
发表于 2025-3-30 07:00:46
Valerie Brachyaies between our work and others’. In this chapter we compare and contrast our theory with seven others: the social psychology of Mead (1934), three theories exemplifying the structure school within symbolic interactionism—McCall and Simmons (1966; 1978), Stryker(1968; 1980), and Burke (e.g., 1980; 1