CLOWN
发表于 2025-3-30 08:31:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8819/881857/881857_51.png
Fsh238
发表于 2025-3-30 12:49:13
Ronald J. Schlemper engaged in a continuation, albeit a transformative one, of romanticism. At the same time, he manifests considerable resistance to the romantic heritage, as is evident in his problematical relationship to figures such as G. W. F. Hegel, Friedrich Schleiermacher and Wilhelm Dilthey in particular.
LAIR
发表于 2025-3-30 18:09:47
Misao Yoshida,Kumiko Momma,Tomoko Hanashi,Yosuke Izumi,Nobuhiro Sakaki,Yoshiya Yamada,Kenichi Oohashonation. It’s more likely, however, given the strategic nature of his adoption of other poets’ authorial personae, that he was perfectly conscious that he was only Byron or Cowper in the sense that his poetry was an art of his own that constantly called upon theirs, both by alluding to phrases, genr
荧光
发表于 2025-3-30 21:21:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8819/881857/881857_54.png
BROW
发表于 2025-3-31 01:23:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8819/881857/881857_55.png
Commemorate
发表于 2025-3-31 06:48:30
r classical education was needed to enjoy their prose: although it shared some of the values defined in Wordsworth’s . and Coleridge’s ., readers did not have to grapple with Miltonic inversions or allusions to Schelling: the essay was user friendly.
DRILL
发表于 2025-3-31 10:03:59
Takashi Nishigami,Masayuki Oe,Tadaaki Takanashi,Akira Okimura,Keiji Nakasho,Kunio Uematsuulfill them. The later Coleridge, it seems, operates by teasing— preparing to confess but confessing nothing, seeming to allude but alluding to nothing. His poems seem fragments severed from some larger context that the reader has no means of reading.