让你明白
发表于 2025-3-28 14:42:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8810/880985/880985_41.png
供过于求
发表于 2025-3-28 20:24:53
Merkmal-Eigenschaft,n is pointed out, first, in general (5.2) and secondly, in the particular cases of the first antepredicamental rule (5.3) and the so-called “triplex status naturae” (5.4). Higher predicates could not be added easily to the standard Aristotelian predication theory (5.32) and they seem to have had a t
conscience
发表于 2025-3-29 00:05:25
Function,nt is first considered from the point of view of its being preferred by Frege to the traditional subject-predicate (6.1). Frege’s intention is to introduce a symbolism for relational propositions, which satisfies an old logical . (6.11). In this context, there is occasion to mention Frege’s relation
排出
发表于 2025-3-29 04:24:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8810/880985/880985_44.png
Wernickes-area
发表于 2025-3-29 07:56:18
Wertverlauf,ve the traditional . as an interpretation of the “something common” which is yielded by definitions by abstraction. But at the same time Frege wishes to keep his . as unintuitive and semantically undetermined as possible (8.21). Thus it is necessary to consider two Fregean approaches to the notion o
可憎
发表于 2025-3-29 12:48:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8810/880985/880985_46.png
GUMP
发表于 2025-3-29 15:35:06
Wertverlauf,f class. The first may be called .; Frege views . simply as a result of definitions by abstraction (8.22). The second approach is that according to which the . signs are . to denote the traditional extensions and then one may ask Frege what he means by “class”.
Grasping
发表于 2025-3-29 23:10:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8810/880985/880985_48.png
我还要背着他
发表于 2025-3-30 02:08:43
The So-Called Logical Relations,5). Some aspects of the relations between Husserl and Frege are next considered. Husserl’s . was still pre-Fregean in matters of predication-theory (3.62), whereas Frege’s review of Husserl’s book was still pre-Aristotelian, since Frege did not realize that there was a hierarchy of predicates behind Husserl’s “psychologism” (3.63).
Lasting
发表于 2025-3-30 06:41:36
The Traditional Lack of Distinction between UF and UO,y, some examples are given in which the distinction UF and UO is shown to be intrinsically required by the very traditional doctrines (and not only by our retrospective projections) (4.5). A brief remark on unit-classes in traditional philosophy is added (4.6).