infection
发表于 2025-3-21 20:01:55
书目名称Studies in Analogy影响因子(影响力)<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0880822<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Studies in Analogy影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0880822<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Studies in Analogy网络公开度<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0880822<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Studies in Analogy网络公开度学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0880822<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Studies in Analogy被引频次<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0880822<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Studies in Analogy被引频次学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0880822<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Studies in Analogy年度引用<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0880822<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Studies in Analogy年度引用学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0880822<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Studies in Analogy读者反馈<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0880822<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Studies in Analogy读者反馈学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0880822<br><br> <br><br>
disrupt
发表于 2025-3-22 00:03:05
Book 1968n that book I tried to disengage St Thomas‘ teaching on analogous names from various subsequent accretions which, in my opinion, had obscured its import. The book was widely reviewed, various points in it were rightly criticized, but its main argument, namely, that analogical signification is a logi
Flu表流动
发表于 2025-3-22 04:26:48
,The ‘Ratio Communis’ of the Analogous Name,f the modes of these extremes. Things are said to be named equivocally which have a common name but the notions signified by the name are diverse; things are said to be named univocally which have a common name which signifies the same notion in each case. The affinity of the analogous name with the
轻推
发表于 2025-3-22 05:37:33
Metaphor and Analogy,hile metaphor is justifiable—certainly in poetry, but as well if for different reasons in Scripture—it is, generally speaking, something the philosopher should take pains to avoid, since it can vitiate arguments and obscure issues. St Thomas himself often characterizes the metaphor as improper usage
高度赞扬
发表于 2025-3-22 11:36:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8809/880822/880822_5.png
愤慨点吧
发表于 2025-3-22 15:43:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8809/880822/880822_6.png
复习
发表于 2025-3-22 19:07:42
Reply to a Critic,l Order.”. In replying to Professor Beach, I shall make every effort to be as succinct as possible. This will not be easy, however, because Professor Beach has apparently not thought through the bases of his criticisms and it will be necessary to do this for him in order to make a decisive refutatio
xanthelasma
发表于 2025-3-22 23:37:15
Is the Term , Analogous?,hat is, if souls are specifically different, are they or are they not contained in a common genus.. Obviously the answers to these questions will determine whether the term “soul” signifies univocally or not. If there is a common genus, there will be a common notion or . and the term signifying it w
Palpable
发表于 2025-3-23 04:54:07
Metaphor and Fundamental Ontology,sion that follows is Aristotle. I shall rely on him for indications of the origins of philosophy and it is with his conception of metaphor that I will be dealing. Later on, certain positions of Owen Barfield will be considered at some little length. It will end by asking whether Aristotle and Barfield are at odds.
不来
发表于 2025-3-23 05:54:41
,“Analogy” is Analogous,to look up the word “dictionary” it would be fair to ask if the trip is necessary. Similarly, if one could be expected to understand the claim that “analogy” is analogous, made in the course of an explanation of analogy, one would scarcely be in need of enlightenment in the first place.