bibliophile
发表于 2025-3-25 06:13:02
he British Army Act 1881..Chapter 4 opens by attempting to understand ‘the shot at dawn’ policy as deterrent and posthumous punishment. It does so from a multiplicity of perspectives: a fictive account of what being shot at dawn might have been like; a more formal perspective of the facts and reason
庇护
发表于 2025-3-25 09:32:15
Jakob Schisslerical approaches to the study of posthumous harm.Provides a lThis book is open access under a CC BY 4.0 licence. .This book is a multidisciplinary work that investigates the notion of posthumous harm over time. The question what is and when is death, affects how we understand the possibility of posth
温顺
发表于 2025-3-25 13:00:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8805/880471/880471_23.png
PAEAN
发表于 2025-3-25 19:28:56
Jakob Schisslery available, able to be called up at any moment on devices we carry in our pockets, and perhaps more so in future, wear on our wrists or on the bridges of our noses— perhaps 1 day even embedded in our bodies. The storage of such digital information has become easier and cheaper, transitioning from l
insert
发表于 2025-3-25 22:19:38
Jakob Schissleriament”. On the newspaper’s online platform, readers could also have a look at “the most dishonest members of the National Council” and even browse through a list of all members of parliament (MPs) ranked according to the extent to which they kept their campaign promises. The ranking was possible du
deriver
发表于 2025-3-26 01:22:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8805/880471/880471_26.png
眼界
发表于 2025-3-26 04:36:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8805/880471/880471_27.png
TAG
发表于 2025-3-26 11:45:47
Jakob Schissleronalism before the beginning of the twentieth century, or was it a pure invention, fabricated to counter Zionism; the second: to what extent was nationalism in Palestine in the twentieth century truly Palestinian, in the sense of being focused on the country, and in the sense of being grass-root nat
ACTIN
发表于 2025-3-26 14:57:01
h in 1918. Rashid Khalidi and Yehoshua Porath are alone in claiming that such an identity existed a little earlier, although for Porath it was no more than a reaction to Zionism. Rashid Khalidi is the only scholar who identifies a positive Palestinian identity not connected to Zionism. In this chapt
blight
发表于 2025-3-26 18:06:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8805/880471/880471_30.png