构想 发表于 2025-3-28 16:32:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8804/880379/880379_41.png修饰 发表于 2025-3-28 20:09:21
Commentary on the papers of Devos and de Goeyo say about the papers, I began with two columns headed ANTWERP and ROTTERDAM and noted down similarities and differences along a time line. This proved interesting but seemed in the end to be “forced” because arguably what is striking about these two policy histories are not the differences but the broad similarities.GRE 发表于 2025-3-29 00:32:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8804/880379/880379_43.pngdiskitis 发表于 2025-3-29 03:43:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8804/880379/880379_44.pngarrogant 发表于 2025-3-29 10:56:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8804/880379/880379_45.png创造性 发表于 2025-3-29 14:53:03
Recent trends in maritime and port historyent upsurge of interest and research in maritime and port historical studies. The first impetus, how challenges have and are being met by ports is at the heart of this volume and we have a host of fascinating papers to consider. In commenting on recent trends in maritime and port history, the aim ofGLIB 发表于 2025-3-29 18:37:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8804/880379/880379_47.pngPRE 发表于 2025-3-29 21:44:30
Port traffic in Rotterdam: the competitive edge of a Rhine-port (1880-1914)e in relatively high value goods shipped in low volumes, became more and more involved in the transhipment of raw materials and the efficient handling of industrial commodity flows. Most ports in north-western Europe had to adapt their port infrastructure, built railway stations, construct docks and真繁荣 发表于 2025-3-30 03:28:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8804/880379/880379_49.png说笑 发表于 2025-3-30 04:39:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8804/880379/880379_50.png