chastise 发表于 2025-3-23 12:21:03
Brian J. Howardnd the standard model. While this is a very conservative approach and thus maybe not very attractive to many researchers, it has the advantage that pushing the theory to its logical frontiers will undoubtedly either result in a successful theory or derive exactly which extra structures are required,Misnomer 发表于 2025-3-23 15:12:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8804/880335/880335_12.pngBlood-Vessels 发表于 2025-3-23 20:54:54
J. Demaison, CVM proposed a dramatically simple approach that skipped many of the steps in traditional risk assessment. The basic idea was to assume that human health risks were directly proportional to some suitably defined exposure metric. In symbols: Risk = K × Exposure, where “Exposure” would be defined in河潭 发表于 2025-3-23 23:06:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8804/880335/880335_14.png个人长篇演说 发表于 2025-3-24 03:14:41
1389-2185 ly, lasertechniques probing both the ground and excited electronic states.Theoretically, the proliferation of powerful computers coupled withscientific insight 978-94-010-4920-7978-94-011-2074-6Series ISSN 1389-2185Immunotherapy 发表于 2025-3-24 06:40:45
B. J. Van Der Vekenl risk assessment. The basic idea was to assume that human health risks were directly proportional to some suitably defined exposure metric. In symbols: Risk = K × Exposure, where “Exposure” would be defined in978-1-4419-3850-3978-0-387-26118-8Series ISSN 0884-8289 Series E-ISSN 2214-7934arrhythmic 发表于 2025-3-24 10:55:02
W. Caminatil risk assessment. The basic idea was to assume that human health risks were directly proportional to some suitably defined exposure metric. In symbols: Risk = K × Exposure, where “Exposure” would be defined in978-1-4419-3850-3978-0-387-26118-8Series ISSN 0884-8289 Series E-ISSN 2214-7934debase 发表于 2025-3-24 14:55:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8804/880335/880335_18.pngabstemious 发表于 2025-3-24 22:45:38
Robert L. Kuczkowski,Amine Taleb-Bendiabl risk assessment. The basic idea was to assume that human health risks were directly proportional to some suitably defined exposure metric. In symbols: Risk = K × Exposure, where “Exposure” would be defined in978-1-4419-3850-3978-0-387-26118-8Series ISSN 0884-8289 Series E-ISSN 2214-7934左右连贯 发表于 2025-3-25 01:04:22
Harald Møllendall risk assessment. The basic idea was to assume that human health risks were directly proportional to some suitably defined exposure metric. In symbols: Risk = K × Exposure, where “Exposure” would be defined in978-1-4419-3850-3978-0-387-26118-8Series ISSN 0884-8289 Series E-ISSN 2214-7934