adipose-tissue
发表于 2025-3-25 04:07:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8762/876193/876193_21.png
FACET
发表于 2025-3-25 10:35:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8762/876193/876193_22.png
Osteoarthritis
发表于 2025-3-25 12:23:44
George Villiers, Duke of Buckingham,s spent in especially conspicuous consumption. He dominated and ultimately controlled the patronage network at the Courts of James I and Charles I. He was, in effect, the chief minister of both kings, although there were important differences between the extent of his control of decisionmaking under James and under Charles.
grounded
发表于 2025-3-25 17:59:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8762/876193/876193_24.png
mechanism
发表于 2025-3-25 22:05:29
Introduction, those faced by their forefathers. There was much to support this view. The nation experienced civil war, eleven years of confused and often frightening republican government, a dramatic if bloodless revolution in 1688, and above all the unique trial and execution of a reigning sovereign in 1649. Th
Callus
发表于 2025-3-26 03:30:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8762/876193/876193_26.png
outset
发表于 2025-3-26 08:11:47
William Laud, Archbishop of Canterbury,corrupt style of government which they termed ‘Thorough’; but, while Wentworth spent the bulk of his time in the north of England and in Ireland, Laud was at the very centre of political life with frequent access to the King, so that there were few aspects of policy which were not influenced by him
航海太平洋
发表于 2025-3-26 09:39:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8762/876193/876193_28.png
平静生活
发表于 2025-3-26 14:14:06
Anthony Ashley Cooper, Earl of Shaftesbury,hat perplexing subject — Professor Clayton Roberts has described him as ‘a cross between a John Pym and a second duke of Buckingham’.. Professor Haley’s invaluable biography of Shaftesbury goes some way towards restoring his reputation, but his character remains somewhat elusive.
Tailor
发表于 2025-3-26 19:27:49
Thomas Osborne, Earl of Danby,olicies. The purpose of this chapter must be primarily to explain why this apparently intelligent programme was such a total failure. It will be suggested that Danby was less of a financial wizard than he is often assumed to have been, and that it was not entirely Charles’s inconstancy and deviousne