Adrenaline 发表于 2025-3-23 12:09:22

What can be Learnt from these Browser Wars,s and the combination with proprietary software. The open standard can then also serve as the basis for a proprietary, competing standard, such as Netscape’s Mozilla derivative in the second browser war. The license thus makes it attractive for firms to participate in the standard’s development and promotion.

TAG 发表于 2025-3-23 15:15:52

Introduction,in, 2007; Sebenius, 2002; Yoffie and Cusumano, 1999) have been dedicated to the Internet browser war between Microsoft Internet Explorer (IE) versus Netscape (Communicator) in the 1990s, leaving Microsoft’s IE as the standard web browser. In 2002, IE controlled an estimated 95% of the browser market

Expertise 发表于 2025-3-23 18:03:53

Standards and Standards-Setting,standards: (1) minimum attributes that cover basic product requirements and minimum quality, for example, ISO 9000 standards or safety standards; (2) interface requirements that enable interoperability when products are connected, for example, the HTTP standard that enables web browsers to communica

钢盔 发表于 2025-3-24 01:07:05

http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8758/875784/875784_14.png

Celiac-Plexus 发表于 2025-3-24 04:46:49

Standard-Setting Mechanisms in Open Source Software,ng a product with superior quality given its price. However, IE’s quality was inferior. Yet IE managed to become the winner in standards war I. Three factors affected IE’s position in Browser War I: (1) Microsoft’s bundling of IE with Windows; (2) Microsoft’s control of key distribution channels thr

GUMP 发表于 2025-3-24 07:12:40

http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8758/875784/875784_16.png

headway 发表于 2025-3-24 11:39:13

Introduction,etscape (Communicator) in the 1990s, leaving Microsoft’s IE as the standard web browser. In 2002, IE controlled an estimated 95% of the browser market (Onestat. com, 2002.), a seemingly impregnable position.

DALLY 发表于 2025-3-24 16:11:36

Standard-Setting Mechanisms in Open Source Software,factors affected IE’s position in Browser War I: (1) Microsoft’s bundling of IE with Windows; (2) Microsoft’s control of key distribution channels through exclusive agreements with ISPs and OEMs; (3) Microsoft’s creation and dispersal of proprietary extensions.

paradigm 发表于 2025-3-24 19:00:56

http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8758/875784/875784_19.png

断言 发表于 2025-3-24 23:12:03

http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8758/875784/875784_20.png
页: 1 [2] 3 4 5
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Standards-Battles in Open Source Software; The Case of Firefox Huibert Vries,Henk Vries,Ilan Oshri Book 2008 Palgrave Macmillan, a division