外观 发表于 2025-3-23 13:11:58

http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8740/873994/873994_11.png

充气球 发表于 2025-3-23 14:36:50

http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8740/873994/873994_12.png

考博 发表于 2025-3-23 20:41:33

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8964-1Index; direct speech; indirect speech; semantics; subject; syntactic

DNR215 发表于 2025-3-23 22:46:37

http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8740/873994/873994_14.png

agenda 发表于 2025-3-24 04:23:12

http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8740/873994/873994_15.png

BUDGE 发表于 2025-3-24 10:13:18

Syntactic Meanings,The problem of distinguishing ‘semantic’ and ‘pragmatic’ aspects of sentences has not yet been solved. One of the most suggestive lines of attack is based on the following idea: ‘semantic’ aspects are those which can be related to truth conditions, ‘pragmatic’ aspects are the ones that concern ‘conditions of use’.

向下 发表于 2025-3-24 14:36:08

http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8740/873994/873994_17.png

项目 发表于 2025-3-24 16:59:10

http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8740/873994/873994_18.png

公理 发表于 2025-3-24 22:45:42

Semantics and Pragmatics of Sentence Connectives in Natural Language,one can make it mean either ‘yes’ or ‘no’ as he pleases? Can one in any sense talk about a fixed word meaning here? But if not, what is it Voltaire is telling us when he maintains that the diplomat’s uttering “yes” as well as the lady’s uttering “no” . ‘perhaps’?

Latency 发表于 2025-3-25 01:17:55

http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8740/873994/873994_20.png
页: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics; John R. Searle,Ferenc Kiefer,Manfred Bierwisch Book 1980 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Hollan