HEAVY 发表于 2025-3-28 15:08:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8731/873063/873063_41.pngConjuction 发表于 2025-3-28 20:39:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8731/873063/873063_42.pngcruise 发表于 2025-3-28 23:10:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8731/873063/873063_43.pngGLOOM 发表于 2025-3-29 04:46:22
The Inner Planets and Extra-Terrestrial Moons,he best choice for colonization, mining, etc. Indeed, sometimes temperatures on Earth (e.g. Canada, Siberia) are even colder than those on the fourth planet from the Sun. Oxygen, of course, is another matter, but even with present technology, this obstacle can be overcome. The other heavenly bodies残暴 发表于 2025-3-29 10:42:15
The Gas Giants,is appear so far in the future? For several answers to this question, as well as a description of them all from a free-market perspective, read the chapter. As well, we also focus on the challenges they pose against mankind exploiting them.deciduous 发表于 2025-3-29 15:03:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8731/873063/873063_46.png实施生效 发表于 2025-3-29 15:55:00
Space Boondoggles: NASA, STEM Subsidies,. Hence, this amount, or something very much like it, can be considered a waste of money. The moon landing of 1969 cost some $25.4 billion. Was that worth it? There is no evidence demonstrating that it was. Then there were the Challenger and Columbia debacles. Had private enterprise been responsibleForegery 发表于 2025-3-29 22:17:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8731/873063/873063_48.png缩减了 发表于 2025-3-30 01:18:22
Space Law,s already some burgeoning space law now in operation, and it deviates from law as it ought to apply. How so? For example, the U.N. General Assembly (1962a, XVIII) . (Treaty on Principles, 1966) follows the law of the sea treaty averring that the planets are the common heritage of all mankind, whetheFAST 发表于 2025-3-30 05:31:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8731/873063/873063_50.png