arouse
发表于 2025-3-21 19:15:29
书目名称Soviet Historiography of Philosophy影响因子(影响力)<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0872245<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Soviet Historiography of Philosophy影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0872245<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Soviet Historiography of Philosophy网络公开度<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0872245<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Soviet Historiography of Philosophy网络公开度学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0872245<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Soviet Historiography of Philosophy被引频次<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0872245<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Soviet Historiography of Philosophy被引频次学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0872245<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Soviet Historiography of Philosophy年度引用<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0872245<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Soviet Historiography of Philosophy年度引用学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0872245<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Soviet Historiography of Philosophy读者反馈<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0872245<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Soviet Historiography of Philosophy读者反馈学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0872245<br><br> <br><br>
文字
发表于 2025-3-21 22:25:50
,The Development of , (1920s–1980s),try hardly any specialists in history of philosophy.”. History of philosophy was one of the fields in which Soviet philosophy was not burdened with an elaborated Marxist(-Leninist) theory, and thus was relatively virgin soil..
DOLT
发表于 2025-3-22 03:54:51
The Practice of ,,erstanding of an . process.. One of the consequences of this claim is the idea of a definitive account and explanation of that process, reflected by the project of a universal history of philosophy .
Obsequious
发表于 2025-3-22 08:11:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8723/872245/872245_4.png
crutch
发表于 2025-3-22 11:01:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8723/872245/872245_5.png
勾引
发表于 2025-3-22 13:11:46
Three Perspectives on ,, the history of philosophy, and should be seen not only as part of Soviet philosophical culture, but also from the general perspective of historiography of philosophy. Therefore, the first part of this chapter assesses the status and central issues of history of philosophy as a discipline .
小步走路
发表于 2025-3-22 18:23:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8723/872245/872245_7.png
acrimony
发表于 2025-3-22 23:23:10
Three Perspectives on ,,e ‘system of dialectical and historical materialism’, it had a status of its own as a professional discipline. . was an historiography and a theory of the history of philosophy, and should be seen not only as part of Soviet philosophical culture, but also from the general perspective of historiograp
Vsd168
发表于 2025-3-23 04:47:18
Soviet Philosophical Culture,hilosophical culture. First of all, the historical development of ., the topic of the next chapter, was tightly linked to the history of Soviet philosophy as a whole, and can be divided into the same periods. Secondly, . was one among many philosophical disciplines, and in order to understand its re
DOLT
发表于 2025-3-23 09:22:13
,The Development of , (1920s–1980s),d was marked by a fundamental subordination of philosophy to its ideological function, a subordination which has continued to exert its pressure on both practice and theory of the history of philosophy. Both practice and theory had to be developed: as Bolotnikov noted in 1933, “there are in our coun