ureter 发表于 2025-3-23 10:42:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8720/871961/871961_11.png带伤害 发表于 2025-3-23 15:30:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8720/871961/871961_12.png保守党 发表于 2025-3-23 20:10:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8720/871961/871961_13.pngMedley 发表于 2025-3-24 01:50:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8720/871961/871961_14.pngTrypsin 发表于 2025-3-24 06:26:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8720/871961/871961_15.pngIngenuity 发表于 2025-3-24 06:56:36
The Politics of Prosopopoeia: The , Sonnets,cifically upon women writers’ agency in the genre of the secular lyric. If these histories indicate surprising instances of textual innovation in the field of female writing in the 1560s and 1570s, they also indicate the problems of defining that field solely in terms of historical women writers andALIBI 发表于 2025-3-24 12:24:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8720/871961/871961_17.png借喻 发表于 2025-3-24 14:59:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8720/871961/871961_18.png内行 发表于 2025-3-24 19:18:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8720/871961/871961_19.pngensemble 发表于 2025-3-25 01:46:22
2634-5919 en writers and of English male authors. In this focus on a single genre, Rosalind Smith examines the relationship between gender and genre in the early modern period, and the critical assumptions currently underpinning questions of feminine agency within genre.978-1-349-54268-0978-0-230-51368-6Serie