cumber 发表于 2025-3-30 12:01:59
Herbert Spiegelbergr the phenomenon that smaller studies sometimes show different, often larger, treatment effects than large ones. This notion was coined by Sterne et al. . One possible, probably the most well-known, reason is publication bias. This is said to occur when the chance of a smaller study being publischronicle 发表于 2025-3-30 13:39:07
Herbert Spiegelbergr the phenomenon that smaller studies sometimes show different, often larger, treatment effects than large ones. This notion was coined by Sterne et al. . One possible, probably the most well-known, reason is publication bias. This is said to occur when the chance of a smaller study being publiscardiopulmonary 发表于 2025-3-30 17:06:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8717/871693/871693_53.png开始没有 发表于 2025-3-30 23:06:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8717/871693/871693_54.png称赞 发表于 2025-3-31 01:31:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8717/871693/871693_55.pngCompassionate 发表于 2025-3-31 06:10:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8717/871693/871693_56.png乳白光 发表于 2025-3-31 09:52:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8717/871693/871693_57.pngNIL 发表于 2025-3-31 15:40:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8717/871693/871693_58.pngimpale 发表于 2025-3-31 17:50:30
come to gain moral knowledge. The usual intuitionist answer, and that which I suggest is the right answer, is that we discover general truths about goods and obligations by direct insight, by rational apprehension of them. These truths are self-evident in the sense that they may be directly apprehen的’ 发表于 2025-3-31 23:05:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8717/871693/871693_60.png