Anticlimax
发表于 2025-3-23 13:37:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8704/870367/870367_11.png
accrete
发表于 2025-3-23 17:02:33
Gerhard Preyer,Reuss-Markus Krausseosing” of the American frontier in the bodies of the renegade (anti-) heroes who robbed their way into a highly mythologized history that sanitized—at the same time as it excoriated—the brutality of US land claims. But the closing of the frontier looks different from the other side of the equation,
arthrodesis
发表于 2025-3-23 20:58:37
ose who watch have power over the watched—the power to judge, the power to assign cultural importance through recognition, the power to grant masculinity (Kimmel 1994). With this in mind, the performance of identity is gendered before the action even begins, and the audience can be vital in shaping
同步信息
发表于 2025-3-23 22:33:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8704/870367/870367_14.png
咽下
发表于 2025-3-24 04:43:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8704/870367/870367_15.png
死猫他烧焦
发表于 2025-3-24 06:51:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8704/870367/870367_16.png
TRUST
发表于 2025-3-24 14:28:04
Gerhard Preyer,Reuss-Markus Kraussents “normative masculinity” as an assemblage of manly traits that can be harnessed in the service of nation-states.. Thus, methodologically speaking, the historical study of masculinity and the nation must necessarily involve examining which traits become manly at specific historical junctures, and
incarcerate
发表于 2025-3-24 18:45:14
Gerhard Preyer,Reuss-Markus Kraussents “normative masculinity” as an assemblage of manly traits that can be harnessed in the service of nation-states.. Thus, methodologically speaking, the historical study of masculinity and the nation must necessarily involve examining which traits become manly at specific historical junctures, and
点燃
发表于 2025-3-24 22:42:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/88/8704/870367/870367_19.png
CONE
发表于 2025-3-24 23:12:36
Gerhard Preyer,Reuss-Markus Kraussexual content, warning the writer that such a book “would ruin his reputation … and he was advised to burn the manuscript” (Weatherby 119). Even though Dial Press finally accepted the novel in 1956, Baldwin’s text was initially ignored or dismissed as a deviation in both sexual and racial terms.