FUME
发表于 2025-3-23 12:25:32
Book 2004t from a critique of structural inequality in political, economic and social fields - so much in contrast to democratic principles. But their theoretical perspectives and social conclusions diverge. Bourdieu insists on the radical overthrow of dominant institutions and their control of knowledge (‘s
Cantankerous
发表于 2025-3-23 16:47:16
Touraine and Bourdieu: Two Perspectives,‘subjects’ (individual and collective), while Bourdieu emphasises to the contrary the structural condition of elitist domination, reproduced by social origins and scholarly attainment and ‘legitimised’ by the belief among dominant and dominated alike that the system is ‘natural’ and therefore right. For Bourdieu, this is symbolic power.
袋鼠
发表于 2025-3-23 18:15:05
Social Change: Radicalism or Reform, subjection), on the one hand, and despite the weakness of social movements, considered as the motive force for change, on the other. (Less than 10 per cent of the French workforce are unionised, for example, while the environmentalists and the women’s movement are fragmented.)
Meditate
发表于 2025-3-24 00:37:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8698/869724/869724_14.png
BUST
发表于 2025-3-24 03:34:25
Touraine and Bourdieu: Two Perspectives,nomics, facilitated by governments of Left and Right, which increases social inequality and discriminates against the poor, marginalised and ‘excluded’. But they differ in their theoretical perspectives. Touraine focuses on the role of ‘social movements’, inspired by the free and creative action of
vibrant
发表于 2025-3-24 08:27:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8698/869724/869724_16.png
厨房里面
发表于 2025-3-24 12:33:53
Conclusion,e exists in a vacuum. It is for purposes of analysis that each can be treated separately, that is, abstracted from its environment. But in real life they are intricately related and it is important, in conclusion, to recognise this: to show how the parts relate to one another and to the whole.
Resistance
发表于 2025-3-24 16:35:15
Book 2004 approaches provide compelling insights into the ‘democratic deficit‘ of modern society, that is, inability to overcome the widespread discrimination affecting women, the weaknesses of the environmental movement, persisting educational inequalities and the precarious nature of work in a global economy.
Sinus-Rhythm
发表于 2025-3-24 21:59:11
different approaches provide compelling insights into the ‘democratic deficit‘ of modern society, that is, inability to overcome the widespread discrimination affecting women, the weaknesses of the environmental movement, persisting educational inequalities and the precarious nature of work in a global economy.978-1-349-51687-2978-0-230-00072-8
烤架
发表于 2025-3-25 00:08:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8698/869724/869724_20.png