无力更进 发表于 2025-3-26 21:50:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8696/869501/869501_31.png钢笔记下惩罚 发表于 2025-3-27 03:41:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8696/869501/869501_32.pngRejuvenate 发表于 2025-3-27 08:43:10
Wales,ed markedly from Scotland in the later nineteenth and early twentieth centuries in that there was virtually no constitutional recognition of its national existence.. If the Welsh had a theoretical state of equality with the English, it was only in so far as they were able and willing to turn themselminimal 发表于 2025-3-27 13:01:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8696/869501/869501_34.png不吉祥的女人 发表于 2025-3-27 14:32:52
Conclusion,riod can be explained in terms of region, class, religion, or other factors. It must, of course, be recognised that while the national boundaries between England, Scotland and Wales had an obvious cultural significance, the concept of the regions of England has a certain artificiality, for there wasfollicular-unit 发表于 2025-3-27 19:54:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8696/869501/869501_36.png财产 发表于 2025-3-28 01:30:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8696/869501/869501_37.png退潮 发表于 2025-3-28 03:29:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8696/869501/869501_38.png有助于 发表于 2025-3-28 09:26:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8696/869501/869501_39.pngFLIRT 发表于 2025-3-28 11:38:37
Wessex,acked definition save in negative ways. This was the part of southern England which lay between the South-East, where the dominance of London was overwhelming, and the South-West, where a very distinctive regional pattern can be discerned. Wessex had no obvious regional capital, and no easily-defined boundaries except for its coastline.