专心
发表于 2025-4-1 05:31:48
Commentary on “Explanatory Diversity and Embodied Cognitive Science: Reflexivity Motivates Pluralismerent methodical approaches and their results can connect on an interdisciplinary level. Sanches de Oliveira, on the other hand, intends to offer a description of this plurality under which such problems disappear. In this comment I point out four problematic aspects of his account.
坦白
发表于 2025-4-1 08:50:13
Introduction,l assumptions and experimental practices of mainstream cognitive science. However, the claim of the disruptive potential of 4E research grows old without seeing the announced and wanted effects on how cognitive phenomena are studied. This introduction to the edited volume “Situated Cognition Researc
相反放置
发表于 2025-4-1 12:36:32
A Methodological Problem of Choice for 4E Researchnitive phenomena. Despite this aspiration, the methodology of 4E researchers received surprisingly little attention, although the envisaged change of mainstream cognitive studies presupposes elaborated methodical competencies. This chapter argues that a methodology is necessary for the 4Es. However,