Insatiable 发表于 2025-3-25 04:52:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8671/867044/867044_21.pngatrophy 发表于 2025-3-25 10:15:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8671/867044/867044_22.pngblithe 发表于 2025-3-25 14:48:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8671/867044/867044_23.pngDebility 发表于 2025-3-25 19:02:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8671/867044/867044_24.pngNOMAD 发表于 2025-3-25 23:15:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8671/867044/867044_25.pngrefraction 发表于 2025-3-26 00:21:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8671/867044/867044_26.png分开 发表于 2025-3-26 06:44:12
rdinances on unsworn indigenous testimony. South Australia and New Zealand passed legislation allowing indigenous testimony as part of assimilationist policies, but the significance of the respective ordinances in each colony was markedly different. The shifting political significance of the admissiARCH 发表于 2025-3-26 12:29:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8671/867044/867044_28.png哪有黄油 发表于 2025-3-26 13:55:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8671/867044/867044_29.pngorient 发表于 2025-3-26 18:54:34
D. S. Clarke though often reaching diametric results, somehow must still begin from these common basic points. The explanation for this is found in the specific character of law in the modern state, and the welfare state in particular..978-3-642-09317-3978-3-540-73926-5