新星 发表于 2025-3-25 04:39:42
978-0-230-22421-6Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2006progestin 发表于 2025-3-25 08:47:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8671/867039/867039_22.pngconcentrate 发表于 2025-3-25 14:33:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8671/867039/867039_23.pngcleaver 发表于 2025-3-25 17:04:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8671/867039/867039_24.png勤勉 发表于 2025-3-25 20:14:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8671/867039/867039_25.pngpreeclampsia 发表于 2025-3-26 02:50:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8671/867039/867039_26.png集中营 发表于 2025-3-26 04:52:12
Subsequent Evidencedence from the period after 1882? Further details about her fate were uncovered by Albrecht Hirschmüller when he found records from the Inzersdorf sanatorium from the mid-1880s. They revealed that apart from her spell there in 1881, Bertha spent three further periods in the sanatorium: from 30 JulyA简洁的 发表于 2025-3-26 09:20:14
The Publication of the Case Studyded as far as the empirical facts are concerned, is it not still the case that Bertha Pappenheim continued to suffer from hysterical symptoms after the conclusion of the treatment by Breuer? After all, she undoubtedly suffered from the loss of her native tongue as much as six months after Breuer fin就职 发表于 2025-3-26 15:06:22
Freud’s Account: Reconstructions will probably consider as valid grounds for objection the fact that Freud himself was one of the principal people to question the success of Breuer’s treatment of Anna O. Was it not Freud who circulated the stories about Bertha Pappenheim’s hysterical childbirth and who maintained that the patient明智的人 发表于 2025-3-26 18:54:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8671/867039/867039_30.png