神秘
发表于 2025-3-23 09:54:31
Testing the Significance of Apparent Truthsplete fulfilment of which would establish a significant proposition, apparently self-evident, in the highest degree of certainty attainable: and which must be approximately realised by the premises of our reasoning in any inquiry, if that reasoning is to lead us cogently to trustworthy conclusions’
中古
发表于 2025-3-23 15:07:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8670/866991/866991_12.png
调情
发表于 2025-3-23 20:59:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8670/866991/866991_13.png
钢笔尖
发表于 2025-3-24 00:08:57
An Approach not Appealing to Moral Intuitionitarianism. The reason why Sidgwick believed we could rely on these three ‘intuitive’ principles, while dismissing perceptional and dogmatic intuitionism, was because these three principles use clear and definite terms, because their validity can be repeatedly confirmed by reflection, and because th
遍及
发表于 2025-3-24 02:44:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8670/866991/866991_15.png
cipher
发表于 2025-3-24 09:33:09
Interpersonal Comparison and Maximizationudgment. That is, it seeks to determine what one ought to do by comparing feasible courses of action and by balancing people’s preferences regarding the states of affairs that each alternative course of action will bring about.. Theoretically, Hare’s special version of utilitarianism is designed to
供过于求
发表于 2025-3-24 11:13:17
Reconciling the Dualism of Practical Reasonutilitarianism. According to Sidgwick, utilitarianism and egoism have equally solid theoretical bases; and yet completely different, and possibly conflicting, courses of action can be prescribed by these two different views.
companion
发表于 2025-3-24 17:03:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8670/866991/866991_18.png
Perennial长期的
发表于 2025-3-24 21:26:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8670/866991/866991_19.png
甜瓜
发表于 2025-3-25 02:04:09
Overview: A rare academic study on what John Rawls, Peter Singer and Derek Parfit acknowledge as the finest book in ethics – The Methods of Ethics. With a rather shocking conclusion that ‘none of us can match Sidgwick‘, Mariko Nakano-Okuno lucidly analyzes Henry Sidgwick‘s impacts on contemporary ethics.978-1-349-34049-1978-0-230-34294-1