PTCA635 发表于 2025-3-23 10:37:02
Introducing “Shifts in Compensation Between Private and Public Systems”we exactly understand to be “shifts” between the two mentioned systems (II). After having thus identified the phenomenon of “shifts” for the purpose of this volume, we will try to give a general account of what may trigger or drive such shifts (III), factors influencing the direction of the shifts (FOVEA 发表于 2025-3-23 17:47:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8667/866608/866608_12.png疲劳 发表于 2025-3-23 18:49:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8667/866608/866608_13.pngintangibility 发表于 2025-3-23 23:30:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8667/866608/866608_14.png知识分子 发表于 2025-3-24 04:48:12
Shifts from Liability to Solidarity: The Example of Compensation of Birth Defectsning some kind of peri-natal injury is quite considerable.. Sometimes the physician or the hospital involved can be held accountable for the injuries that result. Roughly speaking three sets of cases typically arise. First, complications can arise in the delicate delivery process in which the physic遣返回国 发表于 2025-3-24 06:42:37
Policing the Compensation of Victims of Catastrophes: Combining Solidarity and Self-Responsibilityims, of terrorism in particular. and catastrophes in general., in the context of French law, and yet in the framework of comparative law projects. In August 2005, he left his previous position as professor of comparative law in Lyon to move with his family to the United States and, more precisely, tharangue 发表于 2025-3-24 12:06:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8667/866608/866608_17.pngnephritis 发表于 2025-3-24 15:18:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8667/866608/866608_18.png昏迷状态 发表于 2025-3-24 22:14:11
Landmarks of No-Fault in the Common Lawtexts has been dependent upon the social problem it was designed to solve. Yet it is still possible to find enough commonality in the different schemes that have emerged to make no-fault in the common law a worthy subject of study in its own right.Indigence 发表于 2025-3-25 01:47:55
(Un)insurability and the Choice between Market Insurance and Public Compensation Systemsums in amounts well above the value of their expected losses. This explanation however merely shifts the gaze of the puzzled eye on to the insured. Why are individuals prepared to pay premiums in excess of their expected losses?