confederacy 发表于 2025-3-23 11:07:41
,Thomas Nelson Page’s Mythmaking and Shakespearean Masculinity,is known by the world today? What is our position in history? How are we regarded?”. These queries thinly mask self-consciousness, insecurity, and fear—fear of upset social hierarchies, the rising white middle class, the free African, the changing role of women, and the defeat of an aristocracy thatlethargy 发表于 2025-3-23 13:59:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8662/866192/866192_12.png凶兆 发表于 2025-3-23 20:04:20
,Who’s your daddy?,en made the symbol of patriarchy, culture, and precedent. In short, he has been made a “father.” Four hundred plus years later, another William is receiving the same treatment. Faulkner has been called “the Abraham of Southern and American literature,” with one current critic going so far as to lame按等级 发表于 2025-3-23 22:44:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8662/866192/866192_14.png不愿 发表于 2025-3-24 06:11:25
Epilogue,er citationality can meet several needs simultaneously—identity issues that ricochet from personal, to regional and national, and back again, and entail race, gender, class, and sexuality, all furiously intertwined and interdependent. These requisites also changed as cultural circumstances dictated,Abbreviate 发表于 2025-3-24 09:11:06
William Gilmore Simms and William Shakespeare,estions hurled at the University of Alabama Erosophic Society with an emphatic “no” and a final “low.” This inse-curity stems from not being a worthy son to “the Englishman,” and such a charge can be read as an issue of masculinity.设施 发表于 2025-3-24 14:14:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8662/866192/866192_17.png用手捏 发表于 2025-3-24 16:42:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8662/866192/866192_18.png骇人 发表于 2025-3-24 22:43:20
iam Shakespeare. Keener traces the history of this appropriation and its attendant masculinities from authors as early as William Gilmore Simms, through Thomas Nelson Page and Thomas Dixon, to William Faulkner.978-0-230-60320-2978-0-230-61019-4Initiative 发表于 2025-3-25 03:01:02
,Who’s your daddy?,nt, “Faulkner has become for me the repository of all things fatherly, masculine, and Southern.”. The author is being constructed as a progenitor, both in a literary sense and, like Shakespeare, with a much larger signification. Why?