单调女
发表于 2025-3-25 04:51:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8651/865063/865063_21.png
Throttle
发表于 2025-3-25 07:35:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8651/865063/865063_22.png
条街道往前推
发表于 2025-3-25 11:41:13
Number and Concepttroduction that the investigation of the concept of number is “common to mathematics and philosophy” and the collaboration of the two sciences was not as close as it should be because the mathematicians rightly reject the “primacy of the psychological point of view in philosophy, even spilling over into logic” (.., v).
Serenity
发表于 2025-3-25 17:35:18
The Notion of the ,uction of such a .. Therein he sought “a ., in function of which the truths of reason — like those of arithmetic and algebra — could be attained through a calculation, to the extent that they are subject to inference”..
Cerebrovascular
发表于 2025-3-25 23:52:07
The Hierarchy of Functions— an aspect which we have utilized in our present discussion of specific problems. And the limitation to two periods is justified by the fact that other changes in the views of Frege were of only secondary importance.
Monocle
发表于 2025-3-26 03:13:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8651/865063/865063_26.png
left-ventricle
发表于 2025-3-26 08:05:10
IntroductionThis is only partially explained as a result of the ‘Frege Renaissance’ (which up to recently had been restricted to the Anglo-Saxon world). It is more the result of the direct utility of these Fregean concepts, either as they are or as modified to intension and extension, in the analysis of many pr
dragon
发表于 2025-3-26 10:05:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8651/865063/865063_28.png
剥削
发表于 2025-3-26 14:51:14
Number and Concept philosophical public then as now was not attracted by symbolism. This work was not intended solely for mathematicians. Frege makes explicit in the introduction that the investigation of the concept of number is “common to mathematics and philosophy” and the collaboration of the two sciences was not
Foregery
发表于 2025-3-26 20:15:10
The Hierarchy of Functionsgressed over those of the . and .. The change is so decisive that commentators — like Bierich, Papst, Scholz, etc. — can talk about a ‘second period’ in Frege’s thought, beginning about 1890. This division is undoubtedly justified, and is not contradicted by the aspect of continuity in Frege’s work