使更活跃 发表于 2025-3-25 04:12:17

The Meaning of ,lse if the antecedent is true but the consequent false – what I’ll refer to as the ∼(. & ∼.) constraint. Focusing on conditional promises and threats, I show that the ∼(. & ∼.) constraint does not uniformly apply to all conditional inducements; whether it does or does not depends on holistic assumpt

Irksome 发表于 2025-3-25 09:19:28

Holistic and Individualistic Constraints on Interpretationproposition and an utterance (or speech act)) and discuss why the analysis I defend is more adequate than Sweetser’s speech-act analysis. Finally, I discuss implications of a wholly pragmatic approach to utterance interpretation for the explicit-implicit distinction.

Dungeon 发表于 2025-3-25 12:00:35

Introduction,ng (e.g. Sperber and Wilson 1995; Levinson 2000) is that, in utterance interpretation, the role of linguistic semantics is much less, and the role of pragmatic inference much greater, than Grice (1989) envisaged. Going even further, it has been repeatedly suggested that linguistic semantics is anyway a problematic and/or redundant notion.

吸引人的花招 发表于 2025-3-25 18:12:57

http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8648/864758/864758_24.png

悦耳 发表于 2025-3-25 22:02:40

Book 2018ternalism, the semantics-pragmatics distinction, meaning holism and explicit versus implicit communication. These topics and the author’s analysis of conditionals will allow the reader to engage with some traditional and current research in linguistics, philosophy and psychology.   .

geometrician 发表于 2025-3-26 04:04:12

http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8648/864758/864758_26.png

Mediocre 发表于 2025-3-26 04:52:14

http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8648/864758/864758_27.png

浮雕 发表于 2025-3-26 12:21:11

Conceptual Correlates of Wordsf Thought Revisited. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2008) lexical-conceptual isomorphism (i.e. the view that conceptual correlates of words are atomic/primitive) and in favour of a compositional account of conceptual correlates of words (i.e. concepts which correspond to words in a language). I ar

会议 发表于 2025-3-26 13:49:49

http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8648/864758/864758_29.png

极微小 发表于 2025-3-26 18:10:12

Revisiting Holismpore, Holism: a shopper’s guide. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford/Cambridge, 1992) argue. First, I introduce (the complexities of) the distinction between the wide and narrow kinds of mental content and then briefly discuss the relation between various philosophical notions of mental content and Relevan
页: 1 2 [3] 4
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Semantics, Pragmatics and Meaning Revisited; The Case of Conditio Magdalena Sztencel Book 2018 Springer International Publishing AG 2018 Th