大酒杯
发表于 2025-3-26 21:07:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8646/864598/864598_31.png
陈腐思想
发表于 2025-3-27 02:13:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8646/864598/864598_32.png
争议的苹果
发表于 2025-3-27 08:05:29
An Underappreciated Analogy from ,cussed in the literature on the relation between Wittgenstein’s philosophy and his architecture. In this chapter, I argue that there is a thematic continuity between this remark and the . (1921). I further argue that what Wittgenstein calls ‘inarticulate sounds’ here corresponds to what he calls ‘no
发芽
发表于 2025-3-27 12:34:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8646/864598/864598_34.png
G-spot
发表于 2025-3-27 16:40:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8646/864598/864598_35.png
一再遛
发表于 2025-3-27 18:10:02
Wittgenstein on Architecture and the Kundmanngasse,on between the . (1921) and the house Wittgenstein designed for his sister (the Kundmanngasse). I start by arguing that Wittgenstein uses ‘architecture’ to refer to two different activities, depending on whether they are pursued in “good” or “bad” cultural periods. For that end, I address also Speng
弯腰
发表于 2025-3-28 01:34:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8646/864598/864598_37.png
惰性气体
发表于 2025-3-28 02:44:09
The Kundmanngasse and Its Significance,of the house. I also present a review of the relevant literature, divided into two parts. The first part focuses on the place of the house in the history of architecture. The second—and, given the aims of the book, most important—focuses on the relation between the house and Wittgenstein’s philosophy.