visceral-fat 发表于 2025-3-26 22:10:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8646/864597/864597_31.pngpreeclampsia 发表于 2025-3-27 02:03:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8646/864597/864597_32.pngarmistice 发表于 2025-3-27 06:10:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8646/864597/864597_33.png征税 发表于 2025-3-27 13:03:34
Legal Theory as a Scientific Discipline and the Variety of Rulesem. The chapter shows that Austin and Kelsen were primarily intent on setting the borders of jurisprudence as a new scientific discipline. Austin’s insistence on the fact that the subject matter of jurisprudence must be positive law was instrumental in defining the borders of this new science. He beAnguish 发表于 2025-3-27 15:29:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8646/864597/864597_35.png较早 发表于 2025-3-27 18:00:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8646/864597/864597_36.pnglicence 发表于 2025-3-28 00:20:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8646/864597/864597_37.pngAffluence 发表于 2025-3-28 02:33:52
The Pluralist Dividean Tamanaha) who, in different ways and with different intents, have provided workable insights into the relation between the legal and the social domains. In doing this, it sketches three basic prototypes of what today is known as ‘legal pluralism’. The first type portrays law as the inner order ofCrumple 发表于 2025-3-28 10:09:59
Legal Pluralism Revised: Law as the Product of Selectionhe defines ‘the Malinowski problem’, which plunges into the difficulties faced by most legal pluralists in trying to ascertain the differences between the social and the legal. Although Tamanaha’s criticisms are worth being carefully considered, the chapter claims that they are not well addressed an敌意 发表于 2025-3-28 12:55:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8646/864597/864597_40.png