有机体
发表于 2025-3-23 13:36:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8628/862785/862785_11.png
Glossy
发表于 2025-3-23 17:56:13
The Logical Empiricist Conception of Scientific Progress,nces. But the Empiricists go one step further and suggest its employment as a model of the explanation of laws by higher level theories. For example, Morris Cohen and Ernest Nagel have said: “Scientific explanation consists in subsuming under some rule or law which expresses an invariant character o
辫子带来帮助
发表于 2025-3-23 21:28:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8628/862785/862785_13.png
evanescent
发表于 2025-3-24 02:02:40
Popper, Lakatos, and the Transcendence of the Deductive Model,nother theory to take its place.. Imre Lakatos recognizes a problem of this sort, but does not follow the path indicated by Kuhn, for he sees it as implying that theory change is an irrational process which can be analyzed solely from within the realm of (social) psychology.. The alternative Lakatos
低三下四之人
发表于 2025-3-24 06:01:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8628/862785/862785_15.png
Consequence
发表于 2025-3-24 07:12:09
The Gestalt Model,hout their changing, and without there being a change in the perceiver’s physical relation to them. N. R. Hanson, pursuing Wittgenstein’s remarks concerning seeing and ‘seeing as’,. has employed gestalt-switch figures in this sort of way in considering cases relevant to the philosophy of science. In
Constant
发表于 2025-3-24 14:28:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8628/862785/862785_17.png
逢迎春日
发表于 2025-3-24 18:22:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8628/862785/862785_18.png
Multiple
发表于 2025-3-24 19:33:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8628/862785/862785_19.png
删减
发表于 2025-3-25 01:51:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8628/862785/862785_20.png