Ballad
发表于 2025-3-25 03:26:09
Quine on the Norms of Naturalized Epistemologyeveral of his earlier and later works. I argue that despite one puzzling passage in the Kant lectures that misleadingly suggests otherwise, the norms of Quine’s epistemology are exclusively doctrinal, not conceptual.
思想灵活
发表于 2025-3-25 09:24:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8626/862515/862515_22.png
Acclaim
发表于 2025-3-25 15:13:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8626/862515/862515_23.png
公司
发表于 2025-3-25 18:22:29
Book 2019 Reference. to his later work. The volume further contains an introduction that outlines the content and philosophical significance of the lectures. In addition, several essays written by leading scholars of Quine’s philosophy provide further insight into the important issues raised in the lectures..
歌剧等
发表于 2025-3-25 22:39:14
,Introduction: Quine’s Immanuel Kant Lectures,tic discourse within a scientific, physicalist framework, where this forms part of a scientific, if abstract, explanation of how we come to know the external world and other minds without an appeal to mental entities or other sensibilia. I further attempt to illuminate Quine’s physicalist rendering
Nutrient
发表于 2025-3-26 03:42:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8626/862515/862515_26.png
Antecedent
发表于 2025-3-26 07:37:30
Endolegomena: This project consists in his further speculations concerning how we have acquired cognitive language. Here, Quine talks of observation sentences and explains how he thinks they can be learned by ostension. This leads him to further speculate concerning how we could master standing sentences, predica
Humble
发表于 2025-3-26 08:49:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8626/862515/862515_28.png
EXPEL
发表于 2025-3-26 15:56:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8626/862515/862515_29.png
Bumble
发表于 2025-3-26 20:51:46
Quine and the Kantian Problem of Objectivityh is in fact a central theme in his philosophy. For his epistemology was not concerned with the question . we have knowledge of the external world. His philosophy takes for granted that physics provides the most fundamental account of reality that we have. And like many positivists including Carnap,