勉励
发表于 2025-3-28 15:38:50
,Introduction: Science Studies in East and West—Incommensurable Paradigms?, the reasons for this gap, showing that it actually coincides with the fact that much of the science studies literature coming from non-US and non-Western European countries has been overlooked in the past. Thus reasoning on the compelling reasons that led to the project for this book, the introduct
即席演说
发表于 2025-3-28 22:37:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8625/862466/862466_42.png
粗糙滥制
发表于 2025-3-29 00:22:42
“What’s So Great About Science?” Feyerabend on Science, Ideology, and the Cold Waras radically challenge wider claims about the value and place of the sciences within modern societies—for instance, by calling for the separation of science and the state and by questioning the idea that the sciences served to liberate and ameliorate human societies. This chapter explores why Feyera
赦免
发表于 2025-3-29 04:17:54
Looking for the Bad Teachers: The Radical Science Movement and Its Transnational Historyd developments in the history of science studies. The focus of the study is Western Europe (Great Britain and Italy especially). In particular, the chapter seeks to explain how the protest forged new transnational links between scholars conceptualizing the “non-neutrality” of science and willing to
方便
发表于 2025-3-29 08:24:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8625/862466/862466_45.png
残废的火焰
发表于 2025-3-29 13:41:19
Blind Isolation: History of Science Behind the Iron Curtain on research and partly on his own memories and the correspondence from his private archive, Pallo argues that in Hungary behind the Iron Curtain there was not much room for independent science policy. The branches of STS, including history of science, worked in isolation from each other and from th
仔细阅读
发表于 2025-3-29 19:19:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8625/862466/862466_47.png
令人心醉
发表于 2025-3-29 22:58:09
Scientists of the World, Unite! Radovan Richta’s Theory of Scientific and Technological Revolutionl sciences based on the Stalinist theory of knowledge emerged in the early 1950s, whereby social sciences were an inseparable part of the everyday revolutionary process and subsequent socialist construction. In the second half of the 1950s, de-Stalinization aimed its criticism in the name of “scient