平常
发表于 2025-3-25 04:42:23
,The ‘Thing’ of Everyday Life, This connection is by no means artificial, for Schrödinger developed his ideas about the “things” of everyday life in permanent relation with his reflection on quantum mechanics. In most texts, quantum mechanics even appears as the true motivation for a (usually short) discussion about general ontology.
MOT
发表于 2025-3-25 08:24:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8620/861974/861974_22.png
Lipoma
发表于 2025-3-25 14:02:05
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1772-9Interpretation; mechanics; monism; philosophy; quantum mechanics; realism; synthesis
无法解释
发表于 2025-3-25 15:51:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8620/861974/861974_24.png
确定
发表于 2025-3-25 20:21:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8620/861974/861974_25.png
languid
发表于 2025-3-26 00:40:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8620/861974/861974_26.png
不出名
发表于 2025-3-26 04:46:50
0068-0346 ive failure of 1926-1927, and that his late reflections (during the 1950‘s) are little more than an expression of his rising nostalgia for the lost ideal of pic978-94-010-7291-5978-94-009-1772-9Series ISSN 0068-0346 Series E-ISSN 2214-7942
Humble
发表于 2025-3-26 11:37:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8620/861974/861974_28.png
横截,横断
发表于 2025-3-26 14:06:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8620/861974/861974_29.png
唠叨
发表于 2025-3-26 18:35:10
Towards a New Ontology,e the classical-like entities of the “sub-quantal” realm which were supposed by him to be incompletely (only statistically) described by quantum mechanics. By contrast, Schrödinger strongly rejected the idea that quantum mechanics is incomplete in the sense advocated by Einstein and de Broglie.