surrogate
发表于 2025-3-26 23:32:13
The Quintessence of the Upanishadic Wisdom and the Solace of Schopenhauer’s Lifee of Reality conceived in the Upanishads that inspired Schopenhauer. The second section reflects on why Schopenhauer preferred Vedantic idealism over German idealism. The third section highlights that Schopenhauer’s fascination with the Upanishads exposes to the world the enlightenment of Eastern mi
使成整体
发表于 2025-3-27 03:48:13
Reason, Emotion, and Beyond: Revisiting Schopenhauer, Bhartṛhari, and Abhinavagupta faculties of reasoning, emotions, and creativity among others. Given this fact about Schopenhauer’s philosophy, ideas expounded by Bhartṛhari and Abhinavagupta regarding linguistic and aesthetic understanding present themselves as more eligible Indian counterparts of Schopenhauer’s metaphysics in g
DUCE
发表于 2025-3-27 06:39:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8619/861862/861862_33.png
airborne
发表于 2025-3-27 12:25:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8619/861862/861862_34.png
Bureaucracy
发表于 2025-3-27 15:30:21
Schopenhauer and Tagore on the “Vanity of Existence”: A Parallel and Comparative Studyensive view, is nothing but a mockery and of “a comic effect”. Tagore, on the other hand, glorifies human existence as the most divine culmination of reality. In the Tagorian realization, man is always “man-in-the-universe”. Every moment is akin to eternity, and the firmament of human consciousness
仇恨
发表于 2025-3-27 20:20:02
Overcoming ,: Schopenhauer and TagoreTagore’s concept of the universal man. The realization of lasting unity is not in space but in an inner inter-relationship that creates cosmic harmony. Schopenhauer’s and Tagore’s thoughts are relevant to the present scenario, which is yearning for global unity and peace.
信徒
发表于 2025-3-27 23:56:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8619/861862/861862_37.png
yohimbine
发表于 2025-3-28 02:54:02
Will to Live or No-Will to Live? The Points of Convergence of the Thoughts of Schopenhauer, Wittgenst of will as “thing-in-itself” and Will as “the phenomenal appearance” has been seen from the perspective of Wittgenstein’s Showable and Sayable distinction and Sri Aurobindo’s distinction between Universal Will and individual will with an intention to establish the conclusion that the key to a life
揭穿真相
发表于 2025-3-28 07:49:27
morality from scholars who have pioneered the philosophical study of the relation between Schopenhauer and Indian schools of thoughts and intellectual history. This insightful volume is a good academic resource for further research in comparative philosophy of Schopenhauer and the Indian tradition. .978-981-13-5533-2978-981-10-5954-4
持久
发表于 2025-3-28 14:21:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8619/861862/861862_40.png