avulsion
发表于 2025-4-1 04:26:07
Arnauld Versus Leibniz and Malebranche on the Limits of Theological Knowledge,el of the Reformation. The idea is this: In Luther’s initial criticism of Catholic practices he accepted the Catholic position that religious propositions are to be tested for truth by their agreement with Church tradition, councils, and Papal pronouncement. But in subsequent writings Luther took th
Overstate
发表于 2025-4-1 06:40:10
Berkeley: Scepticism, Matter and Infinite Divisibility,ed (at least at an early stage of his philosophical development) to be closely linked to the belief in the existence of such a substance: those of the infinite divisibility of matter and of the existence of an extended God. So in his PC he writes:
腐烂
发表于 2025-4-1 13:09:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8613/861253/861253_63.png
因无茶而冷淡
发表于 2025-4-1 15:44:59
,Hume’s Scepticism: Natural Instincts and Philosophical Reflection,e literature of antiquity. I think there is a close kinship between his conception of philosophy and that ancient conception. It is something we tend to miss when we look back at Hume for our own purposes from here and now. I want to try to bring out the connection by identifying what Hume thought p
micronutrients
发表于 2025-4-1 20:39:57
Peirce and Scepticism,s doctrines: (1) the doctrine of the self-corrigibility of science, (2) the doctrine of fallibilism, and (3) the doctrine of synechism. Although Peirce’s reflection on these topics seems mainly to be aimed at scientific truth and inquiry, some considerations will show that what Peirce says in this r
不遵守
发表于 2025-4-2 00:55:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8613/861253/861253_66.png
出汗
发表于 2025-4-2 03:51:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8613/861253/861253_67.png
enormous
发表于 2025-4-2 08:09:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8613/861253/861253_68.png